Universalism & "Father" Aidan Kimel Refuted
Kimel is not a credentialed New Testament scholar. People should be aware of this if they read his material. He doesn't know what he is talking about. He's not even a theologian. In his blog he admits he is not a theologian. He writes: "I'm a blogger, dammit, not a theologian." What kind of example is he setting with that language?
This modernist heretic with his ecumenist Roman Catholic collar is not a Christian. He is anathematized by St. Paul (Galatians 1) and the Orthodox Church. See what happens when unbelievers who refuse to cut-off their will are ordained? They come into the Church and cause endless problems. It is possible Kimel believed in Christianity when he was ordained, but he is not a Christian today. Like "Father" Lazar Puhalo, Kimel doesn't seem to have any comprehension of "the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints." (Jude 3). To be a Christian means we accept the TOTALITY of the divine deposit, not just a few items, determined by the subjective whims of a darkened nous and impure heart.
The Lord Jesus and the Holy Scriptures know NOTHING of Universalism. These unbelieving and unconverted heretics have NO right to come into our Church and redefine and reinterpret it to suit themselves! The hidden assumption in these Universalists is that they have a higher moral standard than God, because they implicate him with immorality by sending people to eternal Hell. What audacity! What blasphemy! They also call Jesus Christ a liar! The Lord specifically taught the concept of ETERNAL Hell. Anyone who contradicts this teaching is NOT a Christian! Anyone who contradicts the teaching of the Master on any topic is an antichrist! Says St. Paul: "let God be true, but every man a liar;" (Romans 3:4).
A Refutation of Universalism
https://truthbetold7.substack.com/p/refuting-universalism
Install Tubelator On Chrome
Video Summary & Chapters
No chapters for this video generated yet.
Video Transcript
Although I want to say a few things about
this
person
last night I
discovered an
article by Craig Trulia
Orthodox
He wrote against
Universalism and he had an interaction with
Camel and
They got in this discussion about
councils and origin.
The Emperor Justinian was mentioned and all of this
Stuff all this talk about
But the council's say in origin it's all red herring from the main issue
Which is the teaching of Christ and
the Holy Scriptures the Bible is the highest dogmatic or
doctrinal authority
in the Orthodox Church
So if you reject scriptural teaching you are not an Orthodox Christian. And I was
disgusted when I read Craig calling this man father. He's not a father. He's not a
priest in the Orthodox Church. He's an anathematized heretic. He falls under the
anathema issued by the Apostle Paul in Galatians 1 because he's promoting a
message which the Apostles did not preach. Okay, so I mean information coming
from church history, the Fathers and Councils, it's all good. I would say it's
of secondary importance but scriptural teaching, the teaching and authority of
Christ is of primary importance.
This is actually really simple.
Camille, I'm gonna ask you a question.
Jesus said about the damned, he said,
"'These shall go away into everlasting punishment.'
Do you agree with him, yes or no?
Stay on topic, answer the question, yes or no.
Very simple.
If you say yes, then you've refuted yourself.
If you say no, then you're an antichrist and you're not a Christian.
You're a heretic, a wolf, you're introducing into orthodoxy your own personal, subjective,
fallible opinion from a mind marked by sin and the passions, and you're disobedient to
scriptural teaching because of your selfishness, incompetence, and disobedience.
other people could potentially be misled and deceived.
Okay.
The idea that a text can be subject to multiple interpretations is a symptom of
post-modernism specifically Jacques
Derrida
Postmodernism
But if you look at the teaching of scripture, you'll see that it categorically
teaches as does Christ
that there is an
an eternal hell and most people go there.
This should not even be an issue of debate.
